The first west african kingdom
Programme:
Introduction
Historians used to
depict African’s tribes that they were underdeveloped, and backward, and to get
powerful, they depicted the colonizers as more developed. But in reality, and as
mentioned in the
handout,
the writer mentioned that Africans were not backward, and primitive, but they were
developed.
Colonization was not far the purpose of
civilization, but they were motivated for economic purposes (market).
The European
colonizers considered Africans as inferior and backward because African man
could have 15 kids, 10 wives. Also because Africans are agnostics, so they did
not correspond to their behaviour, i.e. to European norms.
They behave
differently, their traditions and economical and political style...etc, all that
are inferior. The Europeans believe that they are better than Africans, so they
are going to civilize them.
At that time,
mainly historians were Europeans not Africans, and in order to justify the
purposes, colonizers needed support from Historians who depict Africans as
Inferior.
Notes starting from the first paragraph:
· Ghana was the land of gold.
· African came into the light of History in 8th century, they discovered Africa through writing.
· The Arab land referred to Africans according to their skin, and was called “Bilad al Sudan”.
· Ghana at that time as a power territory was important, according to their power king, and because of gold and natural sources.
· Ghanaian people had a nomadic way of life (fixed), they used to move and they didn’t build houses for settlements.
What attracted the merchants?
· Merchants came from North Africa to Sudan for gold, there was an exchange.
· The Arabs could not speak to the Sudanese because of different languages.
· Trans-Sahara: to transport across Sahara. The writer described the values of trade
· By the 8th century, Europeans realised Africans kingdoms by writing.
· The existence of the value of the exchange was very high. Africans were organised and they were practiced trade (40000 dinars = £100000 or $250000).
traditional west african state
The first aim of
Arabs in West Africa was practicing trade.
The king (the
absolute monarchy) became king through material line and also his subjects.
Certain believe in ancient centuries which characterized those people.
The wealth of the
king originated form trade by establishing taxes on the merchants, who could
whenever raise taxes on traders.
The king believes
in supreme authority (supra human being). He was represented as a symbol of
divinity, whereas the king of Kawkaw was different because he was Muslim[1], and he was attracted by Islamic
rules.
The Negroes
imported salt from North Africa, especially from lacks in Sudan area.
There were many
kingdoms which had relations with historians and traders form Arabian countries.
The contact between Arabs with Africans triggered some changes in African
society. e.g. the way of building houses.
The author
mentioned also the sources of development in the African societies; there was an
organization, and also there was a taxing system and a suitable civilization.
The African developed themselves by themselves.
The author started
with this explanation because it was advanced by colonial period and also it was
done by Africans themselves.
The development of
Africans is backed up to colonial period. Thanks to outside influence that came
form colonial period.
They came to rule
them because they needed the outside influence in order to acquire the light of
civilization, but they didn’t develop themselves by themselves, and this
according to European authors who considered and still consider Africans as
inferior.
Those people were
Hamitic because they merged with people came from North of and North East of
Africa to bring civilization to these countries. The Africans needed outside
influence in order to be developed.
According to the
European authors, each white people could carry civilisation to help this
Africans who were always backward.
The Hamitic
hypothesis announces that there is a Hamitic influence on the West African
kingdoms.
According to
anthropologist C.G.Seligma, there was an interaction between Africans and
Hamites mixing, the influence of Hamites who, because of their civilisation,
imposed themselves on Africans.
The West Africans
were agriculturalists but the Hamites were pastoralists. The writer wanted to
show that the pastoralists were not always intelligent in comparison with
agriculturalists.
The language of
Hausa is Hamitic. According to pastoralists, the agriculturalists and the
language of Hausa showed that the white advanced before is completely false,
because the agriculturalists of Hausa spoke Hamitic language before the coming
of pastoralists, so the theory of agriculturalists was stupid.
The idea that the
Africans were stupid which was advanced by the archaeologists is totally false,
these people were Hamites who spoke Hamitic language, which was closest to
Arabic language, and they were living in nomadic way.
According to
C.G.Seligma, they were more intelligent than Africans, but according to author
the idea is false, because the Hamitic language was spoken by Hausa.
The first contact
with West Africa was thanks to the Portuguese navigator Henry. When the European
countries were living in darkness, there were strong states in African, e.g. the
kingdom of Ghana. There were caravans of transport for the traders, who came
from Middle East, after that, the Europeans come in the 18th century
where they found plantation (cotton, coffee, tobacco).
Europeans went to
the interior states to draw the maps and for trades. They sold alcohol, arms,
and tobacco... and they bought paper, salt, spices, and also arms...
It was the main
reason for the collapse of the states, but the major aim for the European
countries: Germany, Spain, GB... was the trade.
The Portuguese
took 2 to 3 black people to Portugal as evidence that these people who were
different form Portuguese and lived far away than them, could work in their
lands and properties.
West Africa was
the 1st kingdom known by the Arabs, under the name of Ghana in the 8th
century, was called by Arabs: “Belad el Sudan”, which mean: the land of black
men.
El Yakubi said
that there were in 8th century others kingdoms under this kingdom, as Kawkaw,
Mallel (Mali), and the Sanghana kingdom.
The Arabs became
familiar with Ghanaian by trade. The trade was silent: when the merchants reach
the frontier, they place wares on their cloths, and then depart, so the Negroes
come after, bearing gold, and they leave the merchandise and then they depart.
The owners of the merchandise then returns, and if they are satisfied with what
they find, they take it. If not, they go away again, that the Negroes return and
add to the price until the bargain (business, exchange) is concluded.
Ibn Hawkal said
that Berbers had also a trade with the Arabs. Whereas El Bakri described the
capital of Ghana which was a city, saying that the houses were built by mud and
the palace of the king was surrounded by grows, and where dead kings are put,
they practiced the animistic religious.
There were two
towns: one of the king’s palaces which was made of mud, and the second of the
Arabs Muslims which was of stones.
There was a
respect form the Arabs to the African’s territories, perhaps because they don’t
have common purposes.
Sanhaja came from
Tafilelt in southern Morocco, to
Awdaghost, which was a big centre of collecting and distributing products.
Factors led to development of kingdoms:
· There were sparked off by political influences coming to the western and central Sudan form the outside, specifically form non-negro lands to the north and northeast (Algeria – Egyapt).
· Hamitic influence: they said that those Africans were very late so they needed someone (white man) to lead them to civilization, those non-negro people coming from north and northeast Africa (the Berbers, and the Ancient Egyptians) called Hamitic people, they spoke the Hamitic language, they were not white, but they were considered as whites, and for that, they were considered as superior human type by the Europeans.
· Hamitic influence had a great impact on Negroes, they leaded the African civilization. They were pastoralists whereas Africans were Agriculturalists, which gave to Hamitic people the impact on the way of using agriculture and living of Africans, especially the Ancient Egyptians who had an advance in that domain.
· There was a competition between Tuareg and Negroes; Tuareg had an inner close relationship, so they would defeat Negroes.
· Neolithic revolution: far from influence of other domains, Africans themselves began to establish their lives, instead of relying on hunting and eating wild foods, they reactivated lands and plants, and they construct domesticate animals’ buildings, and permanent villages. They adopted new ways of life; this change is known by Neolithic revolution.
· Where did the Neolithic revolution started from? It started from the Northwest of the edge of the Sahara, in a suitable environment. The important centres were Senegal valley, upper Niger and its coasts, and Chad basin.
· The Neolithic revolution consequence: the growth of population, organized governments and administrations, the fall of the ideas that considered the king as a God. Generally, they moved form hinting to cultivation.
· Trans-Saharan trade: trade across the Sahara was a contact between Hamitic trades and Negroes via practicing moving southern in the winter, and northern in summer.
Portuguese exploration in West Africa: in
the 8th century Muslims settled in Iberia by the middle
of 13th Century, Christian
defeated Muslims, who?s confined to Granada; they established a number of
kingdoms (Aragon, Castile...). Portugal had the chance to practice trade with
Africa, Henry the navigator focused his work on the exploration of the west
coast of Africa, by Portuguese ships till his death, than gradually this
expedition (brought from Italian ones) their aim was to control trade and defeat
Muslims and avoid middle Arabs, they explored the cape balance ? cape Verde.
The Neolithic revolution in West Africa:
·
There was no arrangement after the Muslims invasion, so the presence of Arabs gave some changes to the Africans.
·
The exaggeration concerning the development in West African society, it might be influenced by outside influence (as
Egyptian).
There were a relation between
subjectivity and the way of thinking of the king and its divinity; the ancient
Egyptian civilization is further before the African development, so that it
might have a dual influence and an interaction between them.
The pastoralists had some
qualities as militaries, they were organized. Tuareg had gone to these countries
with organization and civilization. The Negroes gained profits from the presence
of pastoralists and used those profits to develop their societies.
These two aspects support the
idea that the Hamites contributed to the development of the West African
society, so that the outside influence is present on this society.
The author moved next to the
kings, He said that kings themselves had origins of white and red men, because
their fourth grand fathers were not Negroes, but they were red skin form Yemen.
These kingdoms had links with Arabs ancestor, which led also to the influence of Islam on the West African society.
Trans-Saharan and its influence
The Pastoralists were well known of using means of transport through the desert
like camels and horses. The Hamites were developed in mobility through using
camels and horses.
[2] To barter: exchange goods.
Dumb barter: the silent trade, i.e. exchange merchandise without speaking
because of different languages.
[3] The route: an open way for travel or
transportation.
[4]
Nomadic: person who traveled looking for a job.